Here’s Why Calling Bitcoin Cash “BCash” Is a Terrible Idea: Over the past few months, we have seen various discussions regarding Bitcoin Cash. One of the main “problems” involves how people tend to refer to this altcoin these days. In the Bitcoin community, it is often known as BCash, which creates a lot of bad blood with BCH supporters. However, it turns out BCash is an entirely different project. Whether or not the team wants to bank on Bitcoin Cash’s “success” with this name remains to be seen. THE BCASH HYIP GAMBLING PROJECT Although it is unlikely the Bitcoin community will ever stop referring to Bitcoin Cash as “BCash”, there is a good reason to do so. By using this term too loosely, they inadvertently refer to a completely different project. In fact, there are multiple projects with the BCash name as we speak, none of which have anything to do with the alternative version of Bitcoin. BCash.games, for example, is a project which combines masternodes with gambling. Moreover, BCash is actually undergoing an ICO as we speak. The last thing most Bitcoin community members want is to inadvertently shill an initial coin offering which has everything to prove. If people could put their egos aside every now and then, the whole “Bitcoin Cash is BCash” debate would never have ensued to begin with. Unfortunately, it is the situation we have to deal with right now, and it seems unlikely anything will change in this regard. To put this into perspective, the BCash project we are referring to has nothing to do with Bitcoin Cash whatsoever. Instead, it’s a decentralized ecosystem for the gaming and casino industry. The BCash team wants to connect game developers, players, casinos and contributors through an API. It’s not necessarily something we haven’t seen attempted before, but more competition in this market can only be considered a good thing. Although the legality of this particular ICO has yet to be determined, its team has unveiled some interesting features. More specifically, one of their projects involves what can only be described as a clear HYIP Ponzi scheme. Users who invest specific amounts will accrue interest of up to 30% after 190 days and have their capital returned to them. Schemes like these are always something to be very wary of, as they usually don’t end well for the people who invest in them. It seems multiple HYIP schemes will be launched, differing in terms of their particular direction and “casino” theme. Rest assured a lot of people will lose their hard-earned money when investing in any of the current or future programs associated with this BCash project. At this rate, one would almost assume that the project exists to give Bitcoin Cash a bad name, although that may not necessarily be the case. It’s best to steer away from this particular platform, though, as its offerings seem very shady at best. No one knows for sure what the future will hold for this specific BCash project. One thing everyone needs to keep in mind is that it has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin Cash. We can only hope the cryptocurrency community stops calling the popular altcoin “BCash”, as it is evident there are a few projects out there using the same name for less legitimate purposes. It’s an interesting situation well worth keeping an eye on, especially as far as the BCash HYIP Gambling Project is concerned.
A foodstuff seller, Chidi Ibiam, 27, was yesterday sentenced to 21 years imprisonment by an Ikeja High Court for defiling a six-year-old girl. They worship in the same church. The presiding judge, Justice Sedoten Ogunsanya, found the convict who lives at Baruwa, Ipaja area of Lagos, guilty of one-count charge of defilement. The judge held: “I have noted all the relevant facts of this case before me. The defendant is, hereby, found guilty of the crime of defilement and is sentenced to 21 years in prison.” During the trial, the prosecution, led by state counsel, Mr Adebayo Haroun, had told the court that Ibiam committed the offence on December 15, 2012, and was caught after the victim reported the assault to her mother. According to the prosecution, the convict is well known to the victim’s family as he was a neighbour and fellow church member. Testifying before the judge, the six-year-old girl (names withheld), had told the court that the defendant had unlawful carnal kno
Comments
Post a Comment